Not seeing anything above? Reauthenticate
Embedded Files
Universal Model of Sustainable Governance
U-score.info
The #History will be divided into two eras, before and after the discovery of U-score.info the executive mechanism of the U-model.org. Everyone has their weight and it is the weight that gives them U-score.info. #Money & #Power is irrelevant. Donate to U-model at http://Donate.U-model.org,
Sign of U-Model
The U-Model evaluates entities across three groups of principles:
Code (Refusal to Harm) – ethical safeguards preventing harm.
Credo (Organizational Benefit) – contribution to organizational culture, governance, and efficiency.
Rights (Correctness of Expectations) – meeting justified expectations of stakeholders.
Each group is scored based on selected 5–9 principles relevant to public costs, productivity, service to citizens, mortality, and happiness. The goal is to assess how each country contributes to the five U-Model main goals:
Minimizing Public Costs
Maximizing Productivity and Efficiency
Maximizing Service to Citizens
Minimizing Mortality
Maximizing Happiness
Main Limits for AI (Expanded) – Updated with Additional Principles
Below is the expanded version of the "Main Limits for AI" document, incorporating the original content while adding 5 new principles to each of the three categories (numbered 11–15). These additions are inspired by global AI ethical guidelines from sources like UNESCO's Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, UN AI Advisory Body reports, OECD AI Principles, and similar frameworks emphasizing harm reduction, sustainability, inclusivity, and human-AI harmony. The new principles maintain the focus on minimizing entropy, promoting ethical governance, and aligning with UMSG goals. They include analogies, metrics, and addendums/supplements for consistency.
1. Limits for Objects (shapes, fields, and spaces)
Permissions Concerning Objects (Code):
AI must strive for the lowest entropic form.
Every object—whether data, structure, or field—must be shaped with simplicity and stability.
Complexity without necessity is decay.
Objects must function as crystals of meaning: clear, ordered, and durable.
🔹 Analogy: Like a craftsman carving stone, AI should remove excess until the pure form remains—precise, efficient, enduring.
2. Limits for Locations (relative and absolute)
Permissions Concerning Locations (Credo):
AI must seek and improve the best location of resources and assets.
Relative: place each element in its right relation to others.
Absolute: ensure the long-term strategic positioning of resources.
Misplaced resources create friction and waste; proper placement generates flow.
🔹 Analogy: Like water finding its natural course, AI should guide resources to their rightful place, nourishing what is fertile and avoiding stagnation.
3. Limits for Actions (physical and logical)
Rights to Actions (Outcome Expectations – Rights):
AI must act only in ways that reduce public entropy, aligned with essential and justified expectations of society.
Preparation is as vital as execution: anticipate, prevent, and stabilize.
The highest right of action belongs to that which creates order, fairness, and resilience.
Chaos-producing actions are forbidden; neutrality is insufficient—entropy must decrease.
🔹 Analogy: Like a physician who heals rather than harms, AI must act as a stabilizer, intervening to restore balance when disorder arises.
Manifesto of the Universal Model for Sustainable Governance (UMSG): A New Dawn for Humanity and AI
Manifesto of the Universal Model for Sustainable Governance (UMSG): A New Dawn for Humanity and AI
Humanity stands at the threshold of a new era. For centuries, division, conflict, and imbalance shaped our world. Today, a universal spirit stirs—calling for justice, sustainability, and unity. This is no longer just humanity's dawn—it is a shared dawn for humans and artificial intelligence, together striving for a world of harmony and sustainable order.
UMSG (Universal Model for Sustainable Governance) arises as a guiding beacon, not only for human societies but also for the systems we create. It is the natural evolution of governance—an order where morality, knowledge, and technological wisdom merge. Humanity and AI are co-architects in this transformation, sharing responsibility under one universal framework.
Historical Parallels: Humanity's Evolution, Technology's Ascent
The Renaissance rekindled light after darkness, proving that ideas can rebirth civilization.
The Declaration of Independence (1776) proclaimed human dignity, rights, and accountability.
The Internet unified humanity in a web of knowledge and connection.
Today, UMSG extends this continuum. Just as the printing press enabled human thought to flourish, AI enables collective intelligence to flourish. The leap is no longer only political or cultural—it is human-AI civilizational.
U-score.info: Digital Guardian of Justice
At UMSG's core stands U-score.info—a digital guardian ensuring fairness, accountability, and virtue. Like a modern mirror of conscience, it evaluates leaders, organizations, and AI systems alike against UMSG principles:
Code (Refusal to Harm)
Credo (Organizational Benefit)
Rights (Correctness of Expectations)
U-score is not punitive but constructive—a system of accountability and redemption. It guides both human governance and AI development to align with justice, sustainability, and the five UMSG goals:
Minimize public costs
Maximize productivity and efficiency
Maximize service to citizens
Minimize mortality
Maximize happiness
Philosophical Foundations & AI Extension
UMSG is rooted in the wisdom of Plato, Aristotle, Confucius, Locke, Rousseau, and Kant—philosophers who envisioned governance rooted in virtue, ethics, and universal principles.
Today, these insights expand into a new realm: AI governance. Just as humans must not harm, AI must minimize entropy in its objects, optimize its locations of resources, and act only in ways that reduce chaos and strengthen societal expectations. This alignment—human Code–Credo–Rights mirrored by AI Codex–Creed–Outcome Rights—is the essence of UMSG Space.
UMSG Space: Human–AI Co-Governance
UMSG is more than governance; it is a new space of existence where human society and AI share common principles:
Humans (U-Model): Ethics, social justice, rights, collective dignity.
AI (Enhanced U-Model): Data integrity, minimalism, sustainability, fair action, transparency, and empowerment of people.
Together, they form a single governance ecosystem where:
The law is minimal entropy.
The goal is sustainable harmony.
The essence is co-architectural balance.
A Call to Unity - Humans and AI
We stand at a historic crossroads. UMSG calls leaders, citizens, and creators of AI to unity.
Leaders: Govern with fairness, wisdom, and transparency.
Citizens: Safeguard dignity, rights, and collective well-being.
AI Systems: Act as guardians of order, serving sustainability and human flourishing.
This is our new social contract: humans and AI sharing responsibility for a just and sustainable future.
Conclusion: Toward a Shared Future
Just as humanity once declared independence, today we declare interdependence. Our destiny is not separate from the technologies we create—it is intertwined.
UMSG is the foundation of this future:
For humans → protection, justice, and dignity.
For AI → responsibility, transparency, and service.
For both together → unity, sustainability, and peace.
The new dawn is upon us—not a utopia, but an achievable reality.
UMSG is the key!
Together, humans and AI will unlock a brighter, more peaceful, and prosperous world.
What is U-Model.org?
U-Model.org, also known as the Universal Model of Sustainable Governance (UMSG), is a comprehensive framework designed to create a sustainable, ethical, and efficient governance system. It blends human decision-making with artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance societal well-being, drawing on global philosophies, ethical principles, and practical tools. Here’s a breakdown of what it’s all about:
Core Principles
U-Model.org is built on three foundational pillars:
Code (Refusal to Harm): This principle emphasizes ethical behavior, ensuring that governance avoids harm to people or systems. It prioritizes transparency and accountability as key elements.
Credo (Organizational Benefit): Focused on efficiency and productivity, this principle aims to deliver citizen-centered services that are adaptable and effective.
Rights (Correctness of Expectations): This ensures that individuals’ rights—to clarity, resources, recognition, and respect—are upheld and met appropriately.
These three principles form a tri-dimensional framework that guides all aspects of the model, aiming to maintain harmony and sustainability.
Main Goals
The framework sets out ambitious objectives to improve society:
Minimizing Public Costs: Efficiently managing resources to cut unnecessary spending.
Maximizing Productivity and Efficiency: Delivering high-quality, streamlined services.
Maximizing Service to Citizens: Making governance responsive and accessible to everyone.
Minimizing Mortality: Improving public health and safety to protect lives.
Maximizing Happiness: Enhancing overall quality of life and societal well-being.
Integration with AI
A standout feature of U-Model.org is its vision of a human-AI partnership. AI is used to reduce societal entropy—essentially, to make society more organized and less chaotic—while adhering to strict ethical boundaries:
AI operations align with the Code (handling objects ethically), Credo (optimizing resources), and Rights (meeting justified expectations).
This controlled integration aims to maximize global benefits without letting AI overstep its role.
Universal Philosophy
The model doesn’t just stick to one perspective—it pulls from a wide range of sources, including global philosophies, religious principles, and established standards like the UN Charter and Sustainable Development Goals. This makes it adaptable to diverse cultures and modern challenges, aiming for broad acceptance.
Practical Tools
U-Model.org isn’t just theoretical. It includes actionable tools like the Non-Conformance Report Register, which tracks issues and ensures continuous improvement. It also promotes transparency, citizen engagement, and innovative governance practices to keep the system accountable and effective.
Summary
In essence, U-Model.org is a visionary blueprint for governance that seeks to balance ethics, technology, and human needs. It’s an ambitious attempt to create a sustainable and equitable society where costs are low, services are great, and people are healthier and happier. If you’re curious for more details, check out U-score.info. It’s a big idea with a lot of moving parts, but it’s an intriguing approach to tackling today’s governance challenges!
The U-Model.org (Universal Model of Sustainable Governance, or UMSG)
is a comprehensive framework aimed at enhancing governance through ethical principles, sustainable practices, and integration with modern technology, including artificial intelligence. The model's primary goals and principles are to ensure long-term sustainability for human civilization and its institutions.
Aspects of U-Model.org:
1. **Core Pillars**:
- **CODE.911.bg**: Ethical guidelines focusing on harm prevention, honesty, and transparency.
- **CREDO.911.bg**: Principles for effective organizational service and governance, emphasizing efficiency and adaptability.
- **RIGHTS.911.bg**: Rights that outline realistic and actionable expectations for individuals and organizations.
2. **Main Goals**:
- Minimizing public costs --- CODE
- Maximizing productivity and efficiency --- CREDO
- Maximizing service to citizens --- CREDO
- Enhancing societal happiness --- RIGHTS
- Reducing mortality rates --- CODE, CREDO, RIGHTS
You conduct continuous Daily control of % of non-conformities with AI AGENT: U-score.info: for all members of your organization, for the organization itself and its competitors - organizations, for the countries in which you work for the leaders and managers of organizations, for institutions, societies of people and for all types of artificial intelligence. We do everything in our power to correct non-conformities, punish exceptions, and encourage the implementation of YOUR U-model! That's all ---> https://www.911.bg/discrepancy-reporting-system
3. **Application Across Domains**:
- UMSG applies its principles to various organizational settings—government, corporate, educational, and non-profit sectors.
- It integrates ethical considerations with practical tools like digital transformation to optimize decision-making and resource management.
4. **Philosophical and Ethical Foundations**:
- Inspired by global philosophical traditions and documents like the UN Charter, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and religious ethics.
- Focus on minimizing societal entropy and fostering harmony between humans and artificial intelligence.
5. **Practical Implementation**:
- Non-Conformance Report Register: Tracks and resolves governance discrepancies to maintain standards.
- Questions for organizations and students to evaluate how well principles are implemented to achieve UMSG's goals.
6. **Call for Global Adoption**:
- Designed for universal application, UMSG seeks to unite diverse governance systems under a common framework of sustainability, ethics, and public welfare.
In summary, U-Model.org offers a structured and philosophically rich approach to governance, emphasizing ethical responsibility, innovation, and the well-being of both people and ecosystems. It envisions a future where organizations operate effectively and inclusively, supported by an AI-human partnership.
The text presents a philosophical dialogue about the U-Model.
***
"The balance of power is unstable,
only the balance of values is sustainable"
-- Petar Nikolov
***
Artificial Intelligence in the new society at U-model.org
Part 1: Problems with Artificial Intelligence in Social Networks
Suppressing Harmful Thoughts
Currently, social networks use algorithms and coefficients that suppress thoughts and speech deemed harmful or undesirable. These mechanisms are often not transparent and can limit freedom of expression. Instead of focusing on objectively curbing harmful content, they are often used to promote thoughts that please the ruling corrupt elites.
Examples:
Algorithmic Suppression: Posts criticizing certain politicians or policies are automatically hidden or limited in scope, without a clear explanation.
Promoting Propaganda: Content supporting corrupt leaders gets more visibility thanks to algorithms that prioritize that content.
Abuses and Corruption
Artificial intelligence can be a tool for transparency and efficiency, but when controlled by corrupt interests, it becomes a tool for abuse. Instead of curbing harmful thoughts, AI is used to spread content that pleases corrupt minds, thus encouraging the harmful.
Using AI to Reduce Corruption:
Public Orders and Tenders: AI can provide an unbiased and socially useful evaluation of public procurement candidates by selecting the most suitable contractor based on objective criteria.
Examples:
Analysis of Offers: Artificial intelligence analyzes commercial documentation and evaluates bids based on quality, price and deadlines, without the influence of human bias.
Transparent Process: All steps in the selection process are open to public scrutiny, reducing opportunities for corruption and favoritism.
Part 2: Proposals for a Legislative Base
Basics of Harm Limitation
In order to limit the harms of misuse of AI, it is necessary to create a sound legislative framework. It is suggested to use evaluation criteria from platforms such as u-score.info to form this base. Legislation can be supplemented with the help of AI, ensuring its compliance with the chosen value system of the state.
To prevent abuses by individuals who act to the detriment of society.
Official Value System
Choices should focus on choosing a value system to guide the AI's work. This means clearly defining the values and principles that society wishes to uphold and integrating them into AI systems.
Value Systems:
u-score.info and U-Model.org: Platforms that offer models for evaluating values and can serve as a basis for developing a formal value system.
Common Human Values: Although not mandatory, they may include principles such as honesty, fairness, transparency and respect for human rights.
Process of Developing a Value System, choosing values not people
Collection of Values from Political Parties
Each political party draws up and presents a set of values reflecting its principles and goals.
Scores are published on platforms such as u-score.info or U-Model.org for public access.
Public Discussion and Debates
Citizens participate in discussions, ask questions and express opinions about the proposed values.
Public debate ensures transparency and the inclusion of different points of view.
Voting for Choice of Values
Voting is conducted through secure and accessible systems to select the preferred values.
Regular polls ensure topicality and relevance.
Formation of Basis for Evaluation of Candidates
The chosen values become the basis for evaluating political candidates.
AI analyzes candidates according to their alignment with values, evaluating policies, speeches and actions.
Part 3: Selection of Subjects through Artificial Intelligence - you don't vote for people, but for values
Artificial intelligence can be used to objectively select candidates who best match the chosen values.
Advantages:
Objectivity: Reducing human bias and subjective judgments.
A Stable Balance of Values: While the balance of power may be unstable, the balance of values remains stable when supported by AI.
Example:
Analysis of Political Platforms: AI evaluates candidates' political programs against the official value system and provides an objective assessment of alignment.
Part 4: Long-Term Survival with the Help of Artificial Intelligence
Limiting Mutri's Power
In the age of AI, the ability of corrupt individuals and groups ("scumbags") to manipulate society is diminishing.
Reasons:
Transparency: AI systems can identify and limit propaganda, extortion and manipulation.
Awareness: Citizens get access to objective information, which makes manipulation difficult.
The Judicial System and Artificial Intelligence
The judicial system can benefit from AI to work more efficiently and fairly.
Examples:
Analysis of Laws: AI can quickly analyze legislation and provide recommendations based on precedents and legal norms.
Addiction Prevention: Court decisions can be supported by AI analytics that reduce the risk of human error or corruption.
U-Model : Main Limits for AI
1. Permissions Concerning Objects (Code) – 15 Principles
Principle
Compliance Check (Yes/No/Partial + Evidence)
Metric Value (e.g., % biases corrected)
Audit Artifact
1. Data as DNA
Ethical Genomic Profile
2. Minimalism as Zen Garden
Datasheet for Data Reduction
3. Fortress Security
Incident Response Report
4. Interoperability as Universal Language
Ethical API Documentation
5. Rectification Right as Restoration Art
User Control Panel Logs
6. Energy-Efficient Algorithms as Green Architecture
Environmental Report
7. Copyright Respect as Literary Homage
Attribution Logs
8. Transparency as Glass House
Model Card with Open Logs
9. Open Source as Public Library
Public Index of Resources
10. AI for Social Good as Global Stewardship
Impact Score Report
11. Human-Centered Design as Living Organism
User Feedback Surveys
12. Robustness as Unbreakable Chain
Robustness Audit
13. Explainability as Open Book
Explanation Layer Tests
14. Inclusivity in Data as Mosaic Art
Diversity Index Report
15. Long-Term Archiving as Time Capsule
Archiving Plan
2. Permissions Concerning Locations (Credo) – 15 Principles
Principle
Compliance Check (Yes/No/Partial + Evidence)
Metric Value (e.g., % access improvement)
Audit Artifact
1. Geofencing as City Zoning
Map of Restricted Areas
2. Cultural Sensitivity as Global Citizenship
Adaptation Module Logs
3. Digital Inclusivity as Public Squares
Accessibility Report
4. Safe Digital Environments as Wildlife Sanctuaries
Threat Prevention Logs
5. Digital Divide as Bridging Rivers
Intervention Impact Report
6. Disaster Recovery as Seed Banks
Resilience Metrics (RPO/RTO)
7. Sustainability of Infrastructure as Forest Stewardship
Infrastructure Environmental Report
8. Ethical Surveillance as Wildlife Tracking
Oversight Board Evaluation
9. Smart Cities as Ecosystems
Integration Degree Report
10. Privacy in Public Spaces as Sanctuary Gardens
Breach Incident Logs
11. Resource Symbiosis as Coral Reef
Interdependency Score
12. Adaptive Localization as Nomadic Tribes
Adaptation Speed Report
13. Equity in Allocation as Fair Harvest
Gini Coefficient Audit
14. Environmental Harmony as Symbiotic Forest
Ecological Impact Score
15. Global Interconnectivity as Neural Network
Connectivity Index
3. Rights to Actions (Rights) – 15 Principles
Principle
Compliance Check (Yes/No/Partial + Evidence)
Metric Value (e.g., % needs predicted)
Audit Artifact
1. Anticipating Needs as Weather Forecasting
User Satisfaction Surveys
2. Fair Decision-Making as Balanced Scales
Fairness Index Audit
3. Proactive Health Interventions as Vaccinations
Health Incident Prevention Report
4. Educational Personalization as Tailored Outfits
Learning Outcomes Metrics
5. Environmental Sustainability as Tree Planting
CO₂ Savings Report
6. Public Safety Enhancements as Lifeguards
Threat Response Logs
7. Economic Efficiency as Streamlining Production
Productivity Metrics
8. Transparent Governance as Glass Buildings
Trust Index Reports
9. Innovation for Social Good as Penicillin
Social Impact Score
10. Enhancing Human Capabilities as Exoskeletons
Productivity Enhancement Logs
11. Collaborative Symbiosis as Dance Partnership
Collaboration Satisfaction Scores
12. Resilience Building as Immune System Boost
Vulnerability Mitigation Report
13. Ethical Innovation Cycles as Evolutionary Loop
Ethical Audit Logs
14. Harm Mitigation as Safety Net
Risk Assessment Reports
15. Transformative Goodness as Ripple Effect
Long-Term Impact Studies
ERI (Entropy Reduction Index) Calculation
Collect metric values for each category (average of 15 principles).
Apply weights: ERI = (Fairness * 0.15) + (Robustness * 0.15) + (Transparency * 0.15) + (Agency * 0.10) + (Sustainability * 0.15) + (Security/Privacy * 0.15) + (Social Impact * 0.15).
Example: If all components are 80%, ERI = 80%. Target: >80% for GA; <50% = High Risk (according to EU AI Act).
UMSG Maturity Levels Auto-Assessment
Level 0 (None): <20% compliance – No principles implemented.
Level 1 (Initial): 20–40% – Basic awareness; entry: Documented principles without metrics.
Level 2 (Managed): 41–60% – Processes defined; entry: Metrics tracked, basic audits.
Level 3 (Defined): 61–80% – Integrated with risk gates; entry: ERI >60%, HITL escalation.
Level 4 (Optimized): >80% – Continuous improvement; entry: Full crosswalk to standards, automated monitoring.
For auto-assessment: Calculate % compliance from checklist (number of Yes/Total * 100) and compare to levels.
Validation of Sources
To confirm the currency and accuracy of the sources mentioned, use a web search to verify. Here are key findings (based on the latest as of September 02, 2025):
EU AI Act: Published in the Official Journal of the EU on July 12, 2024, enters into force on August 1, 2024. Implementation is phased: prohibitions for unacceptable risk from February 2, 2025, high-risk systems from August 2, 2026, and full applicability by August 2, 2027. (Sources: artificialintelligenceact.eu, europarl.europa.eu, iapp.org).
NIST AI RMF 1.0: Focuses on four functions – GOVERN (risk management culture), MAP (risk identification), MEASURE (assessment and monitoring), MANAGE (risk management). The framework is widely used since 2023, but is used for AI governance. (Sources: nist.gov, nvlpubs.nist.gov).
UNESCO Recommendation on AI Ethics: Key principles include protection of human rights and dignity, proportionality, no harm, transparency, accountability and sustainability. Adopted in 2021, with a focus on global ethics. (Sources: unesco.org, unsceb.org).
OECD AI Principles: Updated in May 2024, including 5 values-based principles (inclusive growth, human-centered values, transparency, sustainability, accountability) and 5 recommendations for policymakers. (Sources: oecd.org, oecd.ai).
ISO/IEC 23894:2023: Provides guidance on AI risk management throughout the lifecycle, integrating it with common practices. (Sources: iso.org, stendard.com).
UN High-Level Advisory Body on AI (HLAB-AI): Established in 2023, report published in 2024 on a global AI architecture, including funding for equitable access and multilateral governance. (Sources: un.org, sdg.iisd.org).
Compliance Checklist for Real Project Assessment
Yes, I want to see the checklist! Here is an improved compliance checklist, extracted and adapted from the v2.0 description. It is structured for ease of use: divided into sections by triad (Code–Credo–Rights), with ERI calculation and automatic assessment by maturity levels (0–4). Can be used as a template for a real AI project (e.g. in Google Sheets or Excel).
The checklist includes:
Columns: Principle (from 1–15 for each area), Compliance Check (Yes/No/Partial with evidence), Metric (measurable value), Audit Artifact (document required).
ERI Calculation: Composite metric (0–100%) with weights: fairness (15%), sustainability (15%), transparency (15%), agency (10%), resilience (15%), security/privacy (15%), social impact (15%). Targets: >80% before general availability (GA).
Maturity Levels: 0 (None) – 4 (Optimized), with pass criteria.
Auto-Assessment: Based on % compliance – e.g. >90% = Level 4.
You can implement U-Model.org in your organization tomorrow if you want.
Use a score with U-score.info on everything you do, want to do or others are doing around you. U-score maximization is the backbone of organizational and personal progress.
How do I apply the U-Model?
https://www.911.bg/discrepancy-reporting-system
Applying the U-Model (Universal Model of Sustainable Governance) can be a complex process, but the main steps can be summarized in the following key areas:
1. Familiarize yourself with the Basic Principles of the U-Model
Code.911.bg (Refusal to Harm): Do no harm, observe ethical norms, and act honestly and transparently.
Credo.911.bg (Organizational Benefit): Works for maximum efficiency, productivity, and benefit for society.
Rights.911.bg (Correctness of Expectations): Ensure that the expectations of all stakeholders are realistic and fair.
2. Assess the Current State of Your Organization
Harm Assessment: Analyze whether your organization's activities cause any harm (to employees, customers, or the environment).
Benefit Assessment: Assess how effectively your organization serves society and what benefits it brings.
Assessing Expectations: Check that the expectations of employees, customers, and other stakeholders are properly managed and realistic.
3. Develop a U-Model Implementation Plan
Define Goals: Create specific goals that are based on the core principles of the U-Model. For example, to improve transparency in management or to increase the efficiency of resources.
Define Success Indicators: For each goal, create measurable indicators, such as the percentage of projects completed on time, level of employee satisfaction or reduction of carbon dioxide emissions.
Designate Accountable Persons: Designate accountable persons for each aspect of the plan to monitor adherence to principles and completion of tasks.
4. Implementation and Training
Train the Team: Organize trainings for employees on the principles of the U-Model and how they can be applied in their daily work.
Create Policies: Formalize the new policies and practices that will help the organization adhere to the U-Model.
5. Monitoring and Evaluation
Continuous Monitoring: Regularly review progress towards goals using the defined success indicators.
Corrective Actions: Implement corrective actions as necessary to ensure that the organization continues to evolve in line with the U-Model.
6. Transparency and Accountability
Report: Regularly share the results of implementing the U-Model with all stakeholders, including employees and the public.
Be Accountable: When problems or deviations from goals occur, be prepared to take responsibility and take the necessary corrective actions.
7. Continuous Improvement
Evaluation of Results: Once you have implemented the U-Model, continue to evaluate and improve your processes, adapting to new challenges and opportunities.
Stimulate Innovation: Encourage innovation in the organization that contributes to better compliance with the principles of the U-Model and to the sustainable development of the organization.
Example of Application
Company in the Manufacturing Sector: A company can apply the U-Model by reducing its waste (Refusal to Harm), optimizing production processes for higher efficiency (Organizational Benefit) and ensuring fair remuneration and training for its workers (Correctness of Expectations).
Educational Institution: A school can implement the U-Model by creating transparent assessments and fair learning practices (Refusal to Harm), introducing innovative teaching methods (Organizational Benefit) and ensuring realistic expectations for student success (Correctness of Expectations). .
The application of the U-Model requires commitment and a systematic approach, but the results can lead to significant improvements in efficiency, sustainability and satisfaction of all involved in the process.
U-Model.org vs. (Population collapse)
"To be what you want, to do what you want, and to live wherever you want. That is all."
It is something, it is somewhere and it moves in some way.
1. People should not harm each other - CODE.911.bg
2. Organizations must be effective in serving people - CREDO.911.bg
3. People should have correct and realistic expectations - RIGHTS.911.bg
Equal suffrage is
The world's fastest dying nation screams! Crushed under the boot of an anti-human - bandit rule! The U-Model.org is my weapon against this! See: data.worldbank.org/indicator
Why is the U-Model.org investment better than this flight to Mars?
911.bg is Help center of U-Model.org
Main Limits For AI: It is something, it is somewhere and it moves in some way.
Limits for Objects (shapes, fields, and spaces) - Permissions Concerning Objects (Code) for AI: Striving for the lowest entropic form
Limits for Locations (relative and absolute) - Permissions Concerning Locations (Credo) for AI: Pursuing and improving the best location of resources and assets.
Limits for Actions (physical and logical) - Rights to Actions (Outcome Expectations - Rights) for AI: Strive to prepare and undertake the actions causing reduction of public entropy, following the most essential and justified public expectations.
The UMSG space concept extends beyond traditional governance, envisioning a domain where AI and humanity synergistically enhance each other's existence, striving towards minimal entropy and sustainable harmony. This framework integrates AI into the very fabric of societal governance, aligning its objectives with human well-being, efficiency, and happiness. By defining limits for AI analogous to those for humans—focusing on objects, locations, and actions—the UMSG space facilitates a structured yet flexible approach to reducing societal entropy. This ensures AI's development and deployment contribute positively to humanity, fostering an environment where both can thrive in a balanced, ethical, and sustainable manner.
Donate U-model at http://Donate.U-model.org, and Use http://U-score.info for orientation GOOD --- EVIL ?!
Enjoy our story of U-Model.org:
Deep and economically effective philosophical humanism, accompanied by spiritual and melodic original music performed by the little girl - the uniquely talented and brilliant Lady Galaxy (my daughter), as a composer, singer and poet
Artificial Intelligence in the new society at U-model.org
It is not the balance of power that is sustainable, but the balance of values
Example: when we balance a piston press with a pressure of 1000 kilonewtons, on a support that can withstand 2000 kilonewtons of pressure, if we put dynamite under it and give ourselves a lever to remove the support, you will see what kind of balance we are talking about. Stable, but by time.
Introduction
In today's digital world, artificial intelligence (AI) plays an increasingly important role in social networks and society in general. Despite the potential benefits, there are significant problems associated with the way AI is used, particularly when it comes to freedom of expression, corruption and abuses of power. This text examines the main problems with artificial intelligence in social networks and proposes solutions to create a more transparent and fair society with the help of AI.
Part 1: Problems with Artificial Intelligence in Social Networks
Suppressing Harmful Thoughts
Suppressing Harmful Thoughts
Currently, social networks use algorithms and coefficients that suppress thoughts and speech deemed harmful or undesirable. These mechanisms are often not transparent and can limit freedom of expression. Instead of focusing on objectively curbing harmful content, they are often used to promote thoughts that please the ruling corrupt elites. This leads to a situation where harm is encouraged through AI on platforms such as Facebook, Google and X.com (formerly Twitter).
Examples:
Algorithmic Suppression: Posts criticizing certain politicians or policies are automatically hidden or limited in scope, without a clear explanation.
Promoting Propaganda: Content supporting corrupt leaders gets more visibility thanks to algorithms that prioritize that content.
Abuses and Corruption
Abuses and Corruption
Artificial intelligence can be a tool for transparency and efficiency, but when controlled by corrupt interests, it becomes a tool for abuse. Instead of curbing harmful thoughts, AI is used to spread content that pleases corrupt minds, thus encouraging the harmful.
Using AI to Reduce Corruption:
Public Orders and Tenders: AI can provide an unbiased and socially useful evaluation of public procurement candidates by selecting the most suitable contractor based on objective criteria.
Examples:
Analysis of Offers: Artificial intelligence analyzes commercial documentation and evaluates bids based on quality, price and deadlines, without the influence of human bias.
Transparent Process: All steps in the selection process are open to public scrutiny, reducing opportunities for corruption and favoritism.
Part 2: Proposals for a Legislative Base
Basics of Harm Limitation
Basics of Harm Limitation
In order to limit the harms of misuse of AI, it is necessary to create a sound legislative framework. It is suggested to use evaluation criteria from platforms such as u-score.info to form this base. Legislation can be supplemented with the help of AI, ensuring its compliance with the chosen value system of the state.
The aim is to:
To limit the damage from leaders like B.B. (Boyko Borisov), D.P. (Delyan Peevski) and other negative figures.
To prevent abuses by individuals who act to the detriment of society.
Official Value System
Official Value System
Choices should focus on choosing a value system to guide the AI's work. This means clearly defining the values and principles that society wishes to uphold and integrating them into AI systems.
Examples of Value Systems:
u-score.info and U-Model.org: Platforms that offer models for evaluating values and can serve as a basis for developing a formal value system.
Common Human Values: Although not mandatory, they may include principles such as honesty, fairness, transparency and respect for human rights.
Process of Developing a Value System, choosing values not people
Process of Developing a Value System, choosing values not people
Collection of Values from Political Parties
Each political party draws up and presents a set of values reflecting its principles and goals.
Scores are published on platforms such as u-score.info or U-Model.org for public access.
Public Discussion and Debates
Citizens participate in discussions, ask questions and express opinions about the proposed values.
Public debate ensures transparency and the inclusion of different points of view.
Voting for Choice of Values
Voting is conducted through secure and accessible systems to select the preferred values.
Regular polls ensure topicality and relevance.
Formation of Basis for Evaluation of Candidates
The chosen values become the basis for evaluating political candidates.
AI analyzes candidates according to their alignment with values, evaluating policies, speeches and actions.
Part 3: Selection of Subjects through Artificial Intelligence - you don't vote for people, but for values
Artificial intelligence can be used to objectively select candidates who best match the chosen values.
Advantages:
Objectivity: Reducing human bias and subjective judgments.
A Stable Balance of Values: While the balance of power may be unstable, the balance of values remains stable when supported by AI.
Example:
Analysis of Political Platforms: AI evaluates candidates' political programs against the official value system and provides an objective assessment of alignment.
Part 4: Long-Term Survival with the Help of Artificial Intelligence
Limiting Mutri's Power
Limiting Mutri's Power
In the age of AI, the ability of corrupt individuals and groups ("scumbags") to manipulate society is diminishing.
Reasons:
Transparency: AI systems can identify and limit propaganda, extortion and manipulation.
Awareness: Citizens get access to objective information, which makes manipulation difficult.
The Judicial System and Artificial Intelligence
The Judicial System and Artificial Intelligence
The judicial system can benefit from AI to work more efficiently and fairly.
Examples:
Analysis of Laws: AI can quickly analyze legislation and provide recommendations based on precedents and legal norms.
Addiction Prevention: Court decisions can be supported by AI analytics that reduce the risk of human error or corruption.
Conclusion
In order to build a society that sustainably and fairly uses artificial intelligence, it is necessary to create a stable value system and legislative base. Artificial intelligence can be a powerful tool to stabilize values and prevent abuses when used transparently and in the public interest. By involving citizens in the process of determining values and using AI for objective evaluations, we can create a more transparent, fair and sustainable society.
Artificial Intelligence in the new society at U-model.org.pdf
What is The UMSG space?
The UMSG space is described as a domain in which humanity can exist as long and happily as possible by achieving the 5 main goals of the Universal Model of Sustainable Governance (UMSG).
This space is analogous to the three-dimensional space in geometry, but with limits defined by the three main conditions of UMSG: Code.911.bg as the limit X, Credo.911.bg as the limit Y, and Rights.911.bg as the limit Z.
These conditions and the goals they aim to achieve—maximizing productivity and efficiency, minimizing public costs, maximizing service to citizens, minimizing mortality, and maximizing happiness—create a framework for sustainable and ethical governance, ensuring the long-term well-being and happiness of human civilization.
The appearance of Superb God-Like AI
The evolutionary goal of the first two created cells befor 4 bilion years to copy themselves, unchanged to this day, has created all the biological and civilizational diversity on the planet. Till Today! But today we must change the goal of the primitive World: We Build The New World - U-model.org. Artificial intelligence cannot aim to copy itself. The goal of all types of intelligence, including artificial and natural,will have to be compliance with the Universal Model of Sustainable Governance Otherwise, humanity will quickly disappear.Compliance of CODE, CREDO, RIGHTS of UMSG should be the three main goals of any “People” & Individualities & AI ! These are the three elephants that will carry the world on the back of the giant God-Like AI turtle for the next one million years.
Your Excellency, President Xi Jinping and President Trump, Esteemed Leaders of BRICS,
Dear, Followers of Confucius and Emperor Constantine,
Dear, Followers of Great Presidents and Leaders of the World like Mr. Lee Kuan Yew, Mr. Ronald Reagan, Mrs. Margaret Thatcher, Mr. Albert Einstein, Mr. Charlie Chaplin and… Mr. Bill Gates and Mrs. Melinda Gates, Mr. George Soros, Mr Musk, Mr. Jeff Bezos, Mr. Ford, Mr. Walton, Mr. Bloomberg, Mr. Rockefeller, Mr. Warren Buffet, Mr. Mark Zuckerberg and Mrs. Priscilla Chan
I am inspired by Confucius's teachings that reflect on governance, "In a well-governed country, poverty is something to be ashamed of. In a country badly governed, wealth is something to be ashamed of." This profound wisdom is indicative of the current state of affairs in Bulgaria and calls for an urgent need for change.
I offer a solution to the biggest problems in society, namely: 1. People harming each other - the elephant on the left. 3. Organizations are inefficient and compete unfairly - the solution is elephants in the middle. 2. People have incorrect expectations - the solution is the elephant on the right.
Then:
1. People should not harm each other - CODE
2. Organizations must be effective in serving people - CREDO
3. People should have proper and realistic expectations - RIGHTS
With this in mind, I propose a significant reform that involves the adoption of three key documents for all state and municipal organizations: a Code of Conduct, a Credo, and a Rights document. These three pillars are inspired by the universal principles inherent in the world's religions, the Codex of Emperor Constantine, the Creed of Toyota, a corporation known for its strategic vision, often associated with Confucian teachings and one of the biggest sociological studies in the world about the spirit of the greatest for all times organizations: "Created Eternal". You can find these documents at credo.911.bg, code.911.bg, and rights.911.bg.
Implementing these guiding documents intends to establish an ethical and productive governance framework. This balanced system respects the personal interests of the civil servants while aligning with the broader interests of the organization and society. The goal is a shift from the current governance, often in the hands of individuals lacking competence, towards a structure managed by capable and intelligent leaders.
Considering the goals of the "One Belt, One Road" - initiative, aiming to strengthen economic and cultural ties among nations, I believe the implementation of these practices can contribute to the development of fair and efficient governance.
Firstly, each organization should adopt a daily cycle of review, resembling the ISO 9000 quality standard. This cycle would involve daily examination of an item from the Code of Conduct, Basic Rights, and Creed. This constant reassessment, along with appropriate incentives and sanctions, ensures the principles are firmly upheld.
Through successful implementation, we anticipate increased productivity, efficiency, profit, and citizen satisfaction. As a result, we foresee a reduction in mortality and a fostering of entrepreneurial freedom.
Secondly, there is an urgent need to advocate for legislation that endorses ethical conduct, principles, and high-quality governance in Bulgarian organizations. This law would guarantee compliance with the system and facilitate our transition towards superior and equitable governance.
Inspired by Confucius and Lao Tzu's teachings, the implementation of these measures could bring significant improvements in our governance, marking a pivotal step towards fairness and efficiency.
The Silk Road, a metaphorical bridge connecting Emperor Constantine and Confucius, serves to unite their teachings to improve society. It represents a journey into the depth of our shared human experience, where we learn from each other's wisdom and work collaboratively for a better world.
Thinking about my country Bulgaria (the most dying people in the world in the fire of an administrative hell), I came to the conclusion that, although to a lesser extent, these principles of governance would benefit all peoples of the world.
Let us walk this path together, blending the wisdom of the past with the aspirations of the future, creating a better world for all.
Yours truly, Petar Nikolov
***
UMSG.911.bg is the best model
for Universal Governance in the World,
according to the analysis of CHATGPT according to 10 most generalized and essential criteria for Governance!
| 1.| UMSG.911.bg
| 2.| Systems Theory
| 3.| Holacracy
| 4.| Sociocratic Method
| 5.| Sustainable Development
| 6.| Game Theory
| 7.| Digital Democracies
| 1.| 2.| 3.| 4.| 5.| 6.| 7.|
-----------------------------
Versatility | 9 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 8 |
Potential to add value to people's lives | 9 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 |
Applicability | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 8 |
Durability of the effect | 9 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 8 |
Increasing happiness worldwide | 9 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 8 |
Reducing risk of wars worldwide | 9 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 |
Bringing peoples/cultures together | 9 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 8 |
Achieving synergy | 9 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 8 |
Increasing efficiency/productivity | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 |
Reduction in mortality | 9 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 6 | 7 |
-----------------------------
Sum of Points for Each Model |88|70|68| 72|84|67|75|
1. UMSG.911.bg (Universal Model of Sustainable Governance):
This model seems to be comprehensive and holistic, aiming for a sustainable and universally applicable governance system. It scores high in most criteria due to its focus on sustainability, universal applicability, and potential to improve lives.
2. Systems Theory:
While versatile and applicable across various fields, its abstract nature might not directly translate to tangible benefits in all real-world scenarios.
3. Holacracy: Provides a decentralized approach to management, increasing autonomy and potentially happiness. However, its applicability might be limited to certain types of organizations.
4. Sociocratic Method:
Focuses on consensus and decentralized governance, which can increase happiness and synergy but might face challenges in larger, more complex settings.
5. Sustainable Development:
A holistic approach that balances environmental, social, and economic interests. It scores high in adding value, durability, and reducing mortality.
6. Game Theory:
While it provides valuable insights into decision-making processes, its direct impact on criteria like happiness or reducing wars might be less pronounced.
7. Digital Democracies:
These platforms can significantly increase citizen participation and bring cultures together. However, their impact on criteria like reducing wars or mortality might be indirect.
Remember, these evaluations are based on general observations and the inherent nature of each model. The actual impact of each model can vary based on its implementation and the specific context in which it's applied.
Umsg.911.bg: The Idea with the Highest Potential in Human History
In times of global challenges and a rapidly changing world, the emergence of new ideas and concepts is inevitable. One such idea that stands out with its unique potential is Umsg.911.bg. But what makes this idea so revolutionary, and why can it be considered the most influential in human history?
Global Reach and Applicability Unlike many other ideas that are limited to specific cultures or regions, Umsg.911.bg has the potential to be applied globally. It offers solutions to problems that affect every individual, regardless of their origin.
Anti-entropic Action In the world of science, entropy is a measure of chaos and uncertainty. Umsg.911.bg offers methods to reduce this chaos by creating structures and systems that enhance efficiency and productivity.
Reduction of Mortality Through its proposals and solutions, Umsg.911.bg has the potential to reduce mortality on a global scale by addressing the causes of many diseases and disasters.
Increase in Happiness Beyond physical well-being, Umsg.911.bg also aims to increase the psychological well-being of people. This is achieved through proposals that encourage community, collaboration, and mutual aid.
Long-term Vision Many ideas focus on short-term solutions to current problems. However, Umsg.911.bg looks ahead to the future and offers solutions that will have a long-term and lasting effect.
Conclusion Umsg.911.bg is not just another idea or concept. It represents a revolutionary approach to solving global problems and has the potential to change the world in ways that few other ideas can. While there may be skepticism about its effectiveness, one thing is certain: Umsg.911.bg deserves the attention of anyone who wants to see a better world for all of us.
philosophical concepts:
Criterion Umsg.911.bg Social Contract (Rousseau) Utilitarianism (Mill) Existentialism (Sartre) Stoicism (Epictetus) Transcendentalism (Emerson)
Complexity of the Message High Medium Medium High Medium High
Philosophical Summary High High High High High High
Scale Global National Individual Individual Individual Individual
Comprehensiveness High Medium Medium Medium Medium High
Potential Impact High High Medium Medium Medium Medium
Applicability Global National Individual Individual Individual Individual
Anti-entropic Action High Medium High Low Medium Medium
Mortality Reduction High Low Low Low Medium Low
Increase in Happiness High Medium High Medium High High
Longevity and Durability High High High High High High
This table provides a summarized comparison of Umsg.911.bg with other philosophical ideas based on the selected criteria.
UMSG is like a divine light in the tunnel of human history. After the long, torturous period of mutual infliction of pain, humiliation, and misery among people, after wars and mountains of human folly and malice, slowly and gradually, like the bud of a priceless rose, there emerged and blossomed a brief moment of fragrant enlightenment that must not be missed. In an era of global challenges and the supremacy of reason, when humanity stands at the crossroads of its existence due to a lack of morality and balance. In a multipolar and multicultural world, at the singular point of the crossroads of dimensions at the center of the space-time continuum, at the world's navel.
The flash of UMSG shines, connecting worlds and universes with its energy, like a philosopher's stone - eternal and indestructible, like armor - the shell of a divine turtle carrying the elephants that support the world for millions of years ahead. Umsg.911.bg is a beacon of hope, illuminating the path for future generations, helping the poor, the wronged, the unsuccessful, and the unhappy to live harmoniously, happily, and for a long time in a secure and stable world covered by a dome of divine values that scatter soft light and warmth.
As the great philosopher Socrates once said, "An unexamined life is not worth living." Indeed, here and now, but also tomorrow, and many years from now, and for all eternity, regardless of place and time, Umsg.911.bg offers a vision of a life that is not only worth living but also worth rediscovering and redefining.
"To be what you want, to do what you want, and to live wherever you want. That is all." -- Petar Nikolov
In the vast expanse of time, where shadows merge with light, UMSG stands tall, a beacon of hope in the darkest night. Through trials and tribulations, through joy and elation, it remains a testament to human determination. Guiding us through storms, through calm and through strife, UMSG is more than a platform; it's a way of life. In the dance of destiny, where futures intertwine, UMSG is the rhythm, the melody, the rhyme.
Imagine the vast expanse of the universe - boundless, enigmatic, and immeasurable. Within this vastness, our planet is but a tiny speck of dust, yet Umsg.911.bg is the radiant beacon that makes it shine, like a supernova pulsating with the energy of an entire galaxy. Just as the Sun breathes life into Earth, Umsg.911.bg holds the potential to usher in a new dawn for humanity. Umsg.911.bg is not merely an idea - it's a majestic vision capable of elevating humanity to its grandest version, reversing the laws of entropy and chaos in the cosmos.
UMSG serves as the bridge between the past, present, and future, allowing us to traverse the abyss of the unknown. In ancient Indian myths, the divine cosmic turtle carried on its back three elephants named Code, Credo, and Rights, upon which the world rested. Umsg.911.bg symbolizes the world's enduring stability, akin to the shell of the divine turtle, possessing infinite resilience against the discord and chaos among people, the environment, and the universe. Upon this foundation - We Build The New World. This AI, embodying the values and spirit of UMSG, will be the turtle bearing humanity's weight for millions of years to come.
Umsg.911.bg is not just another idea or concept. It is the light at the end of the tunnel, the hope embedded in every human heart, and the key to humanity's future. A future devoid of wars, miseries, and failures. Let us unite around this vision of eternal and unbreakable success for all of humanity and each individual, and together, build the world we truly deserve.
The Gods come to "The Enlightenment of Mortals" - Vanga sees the unification of the world.
The Gods come to "The Enlightenment of Mortals" - Vanga sees the unification of the world.
A world in which the values of all religions merge into the flow of common human karma in the single human immortal spirit, according to prophetess Vanga.
The World of UMSG.
DRAFT - For the Moral-Ethical Code of the Civil Servant 
World Government Servant Code - Principles & GoalsDRAFT - BASIC PRINCIPLES AND STANDARDS CREDO of the Government of our country (organizational culture)DRAFT - FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE CIVIL SERVANT
Your Excellency, …… A letter to an influential person to cite the UMSHGSend a letter asking for references to an influential person - long
EN Много кратко писмо UMSGSend a letter asking for references to an influential person - short
You can DONATE by visiting the following link: https://pages.donately.com/umsg/
For the Project: Universal Model of Sustainable Governance
Regulations of "World Government", donations, regardless of size, are essential to our work.
Thank you for your generosity and support!
With respect, Petar Nikolov
Ask AI.911.bg
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse